Directors'
Share Dealings
The
individual entry for each company in the Companies Volume
draws attention with a plus or minus sign to directors’
dealings during the previous six months. In each monthly
edition of the Tables Volume there is also a schedule of
all significant directors’ share dealings during the
preceding six months.
An August 1993 study by Smith New Court demonstrated that
an investor can outperform the market by following directors’
dealings. There are a number of key points to consider when
analysing directors’ dealings:-
REFS has been designed to pick up and highlight all of these
factors. The monthly individual company entry shows with
a minus if any director has sold and with a plus if any
has bought within the last six months. The figure before
the plus or minus shows how many months ago the transaction
took place.
Once alerted that there have been dealings, you should turn
to the detailed list of director’s dealings during
the last six months. The list shows the position of the
director, the director’s residual shareholding after
the sale or purchase and whether or not the transaction
was linked to an option.

Chief
Executive Officer Changes
Details
are given in each monthly edition of the Tables Volume of
all chief executive officer changes during the preceding
twelve months. The wording is taken from press releases
which have to be read with a pinch of salt. Sometimes they
are completely genuine but, on other occasions retirement
from ill health’ can mean ‘judged incompetent
by common acclaim’ and ‘wishes to reduce his
executive responsibilities’ is a polite way of saying
‘he has done enough damage to the company already’.
The
key point is that a new chief executive can herald the complete
transformation of a company, especially if the executive
in question is someone of high repute and the company is
known to be mismanaged. There are many well-known precedents
for very sizeable share-price gains in the years following
this kind of change of chief executive.
The other side of the coin is that an executive of acknowledged
great ability may leave a company without someone of comparable
ability to replace him.