|
Share
Price Graph
The
share price graph presents the following information:-
-
Year-by-year EPS, adjusted to a normalised basis when
historic (a solid line joining the very small circles
on the financial year-end dates) and based on brokers'
forecasts for the future (a broken line between the
very small circles).
- The
average monthly share price shown by the solid line
forming the boundary of the shaded area, which therefore
highlights the share price movement.
- The
relative strength of the shares against the market,
as measured by the FTSE All-Share Index, shown by
the dotted line. The angle of inclination of the relative
strength trend line shows if the company's share price
has been moving up or down in relation to the market.
The company's share price may have been increasing
or decreasing, but the relative strength trend line
tells you if the share price has performed better
or worse than the market as a whole.
-
The highs and lows of the share price (adjusted as
with all other statistics for rights and scrip issues
etc.) over the last five years.
-
The average PER each year, based on month-end PERs
calculated on the latest annual normalised EPS.
- The
relative strength (plus or minus) of the shares against
the FTSE All-Share Index over the last month, three
months, six months and one year. The dotted line shows
the relative strength over the whole period covered
by the graph.
- The
Beta factor which indicates how rapidly and consistently
a company's shares move up and down with the market.
The market's Beta coefficient is one; shares with
a Beta larger than one are more volatile than the
market and shares with a Beta of under one are less
risky.
A
logarithmic scale has been employed for two reasons.
Firstly, it measures vertical movement on a proportional
basis; this ensures that a given percentage movement
will always be represented by the same distance on the
vertical scale. If, for instance, the share price had
doubled from 40p to 80p, the vertical movement would
be exactly the same if the price doubled again to 160p.
Secondly, a logarithmic scale enables a direct comparison
to be made between the graphs of different companies
featured in REFS irrespective of share prices, provided
that their vertical scales are on the same height ratio
(the highest price divided by the lowest price on the
scale). Logarithmic graphs on the same scale can be
overlaid, but this kind of comparison cannot be made
with graphs on a linear scale.
The graphs show how two companies would appear on a
linear scale and a logarithmic scale. The assumptions
are that the share price of company A was increasing
by the same percentage each year, whereas company B's
share price was increasing by the same amount of pence
per share each year. As you can see, a logarithmic scale
gives a far better visual impression of the year-by-year
rate of growth and shows clearly if it is slowing down
or accelerating.

There
is no doubt that EPS and the price of a growth share
are umbilically linked over the long term. The 15-year
graph of Marks and Spencer illustrates this well.

The
trend of EPS is therefore of major interest in identifying
a growth share. The normal REFS requirement for a growth
share is four years of consecutive EPS growth, either
over the last four years, if there is no forecast, or
a combination of past growth (usually two years) and
future forecast growth (usually the current year and
the one ahead). The trend of
the EPS line on the REFS graph is of crucial importance
as the first visual indication of whether or not a share
can be classified as a growth share.
The trend of the average PER is also of vital importance
as it indicates if there is scope for a further status
change. Usually, as a company becomes increasingly acknowledged
as a growth share, its PER rises in step with the company's
improving status. If, for example, a PER had risen from
say, 7 to 30, there would almost certainly be little
remaining scope for a further status change. The PEG
in the panel of key statistics will help to indicate
if the share is over-priced or if the growth rate justifies
the present price.
|