|
Return
On Capital Employed (ROCE)
The
ROCE is calculated by expressing the operating profit
before tax as a percentage of the year-end capital employed.
The main features of ROCE as an investment measure are
as follows:-
-
High ROCE (in the region of 20% or more) is a validation
of a company's competitive advantage. It indicates
that the company has something special to offer -
products or services that command a high return. It
usually follows that margins are above average. The
trend of both capital employed and margins is, therefore,
of considerable importance.
- Comparison
of the ROCE of a company with others in its sector
is a far more pertinent measure than comparison with
the market as a whole. Companies with low returns
are always suspect because they are in danger of becoming
loss-making if trading conditions deteriorate. Companies
with exceptionally high returns may invite competition
for their products or services, unless they are fully
protected by patents or in some other way.
- The
ROCE of a company should always be compared with the
current cost of borrowing. If the ROCE is significantly
higher, further borrowing adds to EPS; if the ROCE
is lower, further borrowing will reduce EPS.
-
Companies with low ROCE are often the subject of changes
in management control which, in turn, are frequently
followed by a rights issue. The most acid test of
new management is whether or not it is able to lift
the return on capital employed.
- The
obvious attraction of a high ROCE is that a greater
than average amount of profit can be ploughed back
into the business for the advantage of shareholders.
The plough-back is then employed again at the higher
than average rate and helps to generate further growth
in EPS. For this reason, a high ROCE is usually a
common denominator of great growth stocks.
ROCE
has not been calculated for banks and insurance companies.
The ROCE of most property companies and of some financial
companies should be viewed with caution, as the statistic
may not be particularly meaningful.
Capital employed is the sum of ordinary and preference
share capital plus reserves, debentures, loan stocks,
all borrowings including obligations under finance leases,
bank overdraft, minority interests and provisions. Deductions
include investments in associated companies. The basic
idea is to arrive at a final figure that will tell you
how much money (whatever the source) is being employed
in the operation of a business. The resultant figure
is then compared with the operating profits before tax,
exceptional items, interest, dividends payable and share
of profits or losses of associated companies. The percentage
this figure bears to adjusted capital employed gives
investors a measure of the return the business can
produce on the capital employed within it.
A significant problem arises with goodwill, brand names,
patents, copyrights, newspaper titles and the like.
There is no doubt that intangible assets can be immensely
valuable, but the accounting treatment of them can vary
considerably. For example, brand names sometimes have
no value in the balance sheet and, at other times, they
are written up in value to a significant proportion
of the net assets. The difficulty is that no fair value
can really be established unless a competitive auction
tests the market. Any valuation made by the board is
essentially arbitrary and, therefore, subjective.
In REFS all intangibles are excluded. This treatment
has the following advantages:-
-
It is consistent.
- It
measures the operating efficiency of a business by
comparing operating profits with operating assets.
- It
does not change the operating efficiency of a business
being acquired. For example, an acquiring company
may pay double tangible asset value for a business.
If the resultant goodwill were left in the balance
sheet, this would halve the ROCE of the business in
the accounts of the acquiring company. In fact, the
operating efficiency of
the business acquired would remain unchanged and this
is reflected in the REFS figures which exclude goodwill.
The
REFS approach of excluding intangibles is flattering to
very acquisitive companies that might be over-paying for
the businesses they acquire. The writing-off of the goodwill
paid for businesses acquired will result in higher returns
on capital employed in the accounts of acquiring companies.
The high returns are being made by the operating assets,
not on the
purchase consideration (including goodwill) paid by the
acquiring companies. This should be borne in mind when
judging the ROCE of conglomerates and other particularly
acquisitive companies.
|