
Market view
February was not a bad month for the blue
chips but the real fun was to be enjoyed among the small caps
and especially on AIM. The FTSE 100 Index ended 2nd March
at 4,540.11, a gain on the month of 3.62 per cent.
Cracking results from BAe Systems led defence
stocks higher while commodity prices hitting multi-year highs
across the board meant that the mining bonanza continued.
A poor showing from two FTSE heavyweight sectors, pharmaceuticals
and banks, was in both cases down to a somewhat mixed set
of full-year results. And that restrained the blue-chip index.
Without any heavy exposure to banking or
pharmaceuticals the FTSE 250 Index was rather more interesting,
gaining 4.89 per cent on the month to close at 6,353.62. With
its heavy weightings bias towards banks, oils and pharmaceuticals
the FTSE 100 is in many ways far less representative of the
general state of health of UK Plc than the FTSE 250.
The FTSE Small Cap Index gained 3.77 per
cent on the month to close at 2,715.62 but once again the
star performer was the punter’s paradise – AIM.
Not a day seems to go by without AIM enjoying yet another
IPO and the FTSE AIM Index ended 2nd March at 935.4, a gain
on the month of 5.13 per cent. Among the juniors, mining and
– oddly enough – technology stocks as well as
the speculative shells and recovery plays continue to lead
the charge. The small investor’s appetite for risk seems
to be insatiable.
Base rates
In the new-look economics A-level everyone has to pass, so
our first question this year will be “Can US base rates
stay at 40 year lows forever?” To make it really easy
this is multiple choice: ‘A’ equals YES and ‘B’
equals NO. Quite amazingly it appears that a good percentage
of investors, especially in America, would still somehow contrive
to fail even this test. The answer, by the way, is ‘B’.
It thus came as something of a shock to many
that with the American economic recovery gathering strength
and even the jobless numbers starting to fall (there had been
talk from Democratic Presidential hopeful and superbore John
Kerry and others of a ‘jobless recovery’) that
base rate increases moved onto the agenda. Even the ultra-cautious
Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan hinted that at some
stage base rates would have to increase, from 1 per cent.
Why does this matter? For starters it has
stopped the dollar sliding. Since the weaker greenback has
been one of the main drivers behind US corporate earnings
growth – certainly among exporters – this might
just curb some of the wilder expectations of analysts when
it comes to future earnings growth. And secondly, one of the
reasons that the Nasdaq has powered up to trade on a forward
price earnings ratio of 34 (higher if one accounts for options
in a conservative manner) is that equities appear to be the
safest home for your money. If one views equities as fully
valued or even over-valued, suddenly moving your assets into
the bank starts to look a bit more attractive if the yield
on bank deposits starts to pick up.
And finally, increased base rates might both
curb the ongoing consumer spendfest and perhaps also deter
some corporates from over-borrowing for acquisitions. M&A
activity is also back on the agenda at present.
Corporate confidence
In the UK base rates were maintained at 4 per cent in March
but few believe that they will stay there for long. One of
the checks on the monetary hawks is that sterling has been
strong enough to pinch exporters. Whilst the hawks might worry
about house price inflation and consumer debt – both
of which are clearly running at unsustainable levels –
there is no desire to squeeze exporters in a way that might
threaten the recovery in corporate confidence. But if US base
rates are increased that might well allow UK rates to rise
without pushing sterling too much higher.
If UK base rates are 4 per cent one wonders
whether on a yield of around 3.5 per cent the FTSE 100 really
offers that attractive a home for one’s money? With
the ISA season in full swing you are no doubt bombarded, as
am I, by fund managers pointing to how equities have soared
over the past year (best not mention 2000-2002) and the implication
is that there is more of the same to come.
But with the FTSE 100 on a forward PE of
around 16 it seems pretty evident that quite a lot of good
news is already in the price. The earnings season that has
just been completed showed that – as a whole –
UK plc was optimistic that 2004 would show another year of
recovery. However, base rates are rising, fuel prices are
rising (crude now trades at $32 a barrel), wage and associated
costs such as National Insurance are rising and commodity
prices have soared. And there is no evidence that, across
the board, all of these cost prices can be passed on to end-users.
As such it is not implausible to suggest that
while UK plc may see decent sales growth this year, as whole
there will be significant margin squeezes suffered by some.
Whilst others (perhaps the consumer-related stocks) might
struggle even to increase sales should interest rate increases
really bite. I remain to be convinced that as a whole UK plc
will show earnings growth of much more than high single figures
during 2004 and on that basis it is hard to argue that equities
offer extremely good value. Meanwhile, if Wall Street takes
a tumble then the knock on effects will be obvious.
Of course there is selective value. As a
stock picker by profession you would not expect me to argue
otherwise. Whilst the strong rally among small and mid-caps
has left some stocks looking more than fully valued some have
been left behind. And so this is not a time when I am preparing
to head for the hills with my cans of baked beans. But equally
I am in no rush to buy one of the many FTSE Tracker ISAs that
I am being offered either.