REFS is
a mine of invaluable information for the private investor.
Selecting shares without its help is like trying to
clap with one hand tied behind your back.
|
|
 |

Share Watch April
05
Tom Winnifrith considers the
outlook for UK shares
Was it a pre-Easter lull? The UK certainly
had its fair share of Bank Holidays during March. But there
were perhaps more fundamental reasons for concern and a pullback.
The oil price eased back over the month, which hit the FTSE
100 (where oil stocks account for more than a fifth of the
index’s value by weighting). Retailers continued to
serve up disappointing numbers with even high-street superstar
Next admitting that it was feeling the pinch. And in the US
the Federal Reserve not only increased base rates by 0.25
per cent (to 2.75 per cent) but, more ominously, warned that
further rate rises would be needed to curb the growing threat
of inflation.
The FTSE 100 ended the month 1.5 per cent down at 4,914 while
the FTSE 250 index lost 1.7 per cent to hit 7,180. The FTSE
Small Cap index was 1.1 per cent down on the month at 2,913,
but the main casualty was the big winner of most of the previous
12 months – the FTSE AIM index. It slipped back 5 per
cent to 1,092. Mounting criticism of some of the valuations
ascribed to many of the oil stocks, gold miners and cash shells
which these days dominate AIM is perhaps starting to sink
in with private investors. Or perhaps it was just the result
of some portfolio adjustments as the end of the tax year drew
nigh. Incidentally, as one indicator of private investor sentiment:
the ISA sales season for 2005 looks to have been one of the
weakest on record.
Political indifference
Let us start with matters on an insignificant small
island sandwiched between the north-west coast of mainland
Europe and Ireland. At the start of March Britain’s
Chancellor of the Exchequer announced his 2005 Budget plans
and the world hardly noticed. Taxes will go up in 2006 and
government spending is out of control. But we all knew that
anyway. At the start of May Britain will elect a new government.
Well in reality, barring a miracle, it will re-elect its current
one and the market prices in as much. Over the next few weeks
as the General Election campaign ramps up you will read acres
of copy about how it may affect both your life and your finances.
I make no comment on the first claim, but as far as the equity
markets are concerned it really does not matter at all. Avoid
the verbiage – focus on what really matters.
Some of what matters for UK equities is concerned with events
on the small, damp lump of rock on which we live. Every day
another retailer seems to issue a profits warning. As I write,
the day’s miscreant has been Whittard of Chelsea; yesterday
it was Boots. Meanwhile data continues to come in showing
that the housing market, if not slum-ping as some had predicted,
is far from buoyant. Prices are at best holding their own,
and it is taking longer and longer for vendors to shift their
properties – even the good ones. So one theme of this
column in recent months continues unchanged (whatever happens
on 5 May) – the consumer spendfest is over.
Somehow it has filtered through to the collective consumer
brain that personal indebtedness cannot be cured simply by
rising house prices and that levels of disposable income will
be squeezed by the tax hikes that are in the pipeline. Consequently
the level of earnings visibility for UK consumer-related stocks
is poor. That may already be discounted in some fairly dull
ratings, but when one can have no great confidence in earnings
forecasts across sectors such as retail, the housebuilders
or pubs and leisure, it would be a brave man who would buy
such stocks now. At best they will be unexciting investments
during 2005. At worst they will be downright bad investments
if earnings start to slide sharply.
Oil shocks
Moving to economies that really matter, the March
warning from the US Federal Reserve was pretty explicit –
while UK base rates are probably close to their peak, US base
rates will have to rise significantly from the current 2.75
per cent to cope with the emerging inflationary threats in
the American economy. This explains the recent resilience
of the dollar (2004’s one-way bet – down). While
that trend is likely to be positive for big British-based
dollar earners (the pharmaceutical stocks and Diageo for example),
a tightening of US monetary policy does not provide a helpful
backdrop for a re-rating of US equities. Indeed one might
argue that it may be the cue for a modest de-rating, and if
that happens it is hard to see British equities heading significantly
higher.
Meanwhile, lurking in the background remains another potential
worry: oil. Since the start of April Brent has marched steadily
higher and now trades at $54 a barrel. According to Goldman
Sachs, WTI oil prices could peak at $105 a barrel (implying
a price of $100 a barrel for Brent) during the next 18 months.
Inevitably such a spike would put a huge squeeze on margins
for heavy fuel users and in the UK it would add to the squeeze
on disposable incomes for consumers. I do not think we will
see oil hitting such peaks but even a sustained spell at over
$55 must be hurting some companies.
Despite having sounded like a born-again bear for most of
this column, I am not. Most non-consumer companies are still
reporting strong earnings growth and order books, and business
confidence continues to improve. Although there clearly are
external risks to the UK equity markets, corporate borrowings
are at a relatively low level, which means that UK Plc should
be able to withstand short-term external pressures. An historic
price/earnings ratio of just under 15 for the FTSE 100 is
not that demanding and selectively equities do offer some
real value. It is not a time for indiscriminate buying, but
there is equally no reason for the bears to start celebrating
either. Tom Winnifrith runs the media and IT group Rivington
Street Holdings and edits the share-tipping website www.t1ps.com.
|
 |
 |